Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs AMD FireStream 9170

ATI Radeon X1650 vs AMD FireStream 9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.33GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Nov 2007
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
320
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
105W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
RV670
-
-
-
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
TeraScale
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy