Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 6200 PCI

ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 6200 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 6200 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1650 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (6.400GB/s vs 3.200GB/s)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jan 2008
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 6 PCI
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
200 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
3.200GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
-
4
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
2
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
560.0 MPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.120 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
-
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
NV44
-
GPU Variant
-
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Curie
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
110 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
110 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
2.1
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
3.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy