Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon X1650

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon X1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2013
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 700
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

863 MHz
Base Clock
-
902 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
-
192
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

43.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.540 GPixel/s
173.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.540 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.156 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
173.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
Unknown
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
RV516
GK110-300-B1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.105 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy