Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM

ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 140 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Mar 2009
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
64
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
208.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
G94B
-
GPU Variant
-
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Tesla
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
105W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
3.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy