Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 OEM

ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 430 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Oct 2010
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
96
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
GF108
-
GPU Variant
GF108-400-A1
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Fermi
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
49W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy