Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM

ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 630 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.51GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Apr 2012
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
192
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.500 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
336.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
14.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Kepler
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy