Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (70.40GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
112 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jul 2009
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
70.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
-
Shading Units
112
4
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
362.9 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
120W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
G92B
-
GPU Variant
G92-240-B1
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Tesla
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
3.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy