Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (141.7GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jun 2008
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1107 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
141.7GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
240
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.26 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.16 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
GT200
-
GPU Variant
G200-300-A2
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
236W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
3.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy