Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1545 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1740 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
-
Shading Units
2048
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.127 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
7.127 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
111.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
90W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
GA107
-
GPU Variant
GA107-140-A1
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Ampere
UMC
Foundry
Samsung
90 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
3.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy