Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

ATI Radeon X1650 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
12
-
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Navi 24
-
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy