Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP

ATI Radeon X1650 vs AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 896SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jun 2015
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
896
4
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
85W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Tobago
-
GPU Variant
Tobago XT
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
GCN 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy