Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA T400

ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA T400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
May 2021
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
-
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Turing
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
3.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy