Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1700 FSC and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1700 FSC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (44W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 22.24GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
May 2011
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
695 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
22.24GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
20
-
Shading Units
1280
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.348 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
2.348 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV535
GPU Name
Cayman
RV535 FSC
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
R500
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.33 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
131 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Board Design

44W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy