Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs AMD FireStream 9270

ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs AMD FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1700 FSC and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1700 FSC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (44W vs 160W)
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 22.24GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Nov 2008
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
695 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
22.24GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
800
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.348 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
2.348 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

44W
TDP
160W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV535
GPU Name
RV770
RV535 FSC
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
R500
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.33 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
131 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy