Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs AMD Radeon R9 290

ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs AMD Radeon R9 290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1700 FSC and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1700 FSC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (44W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 22.24GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Nov 2013
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
695 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
22.24GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
2560
4
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.348 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
60.61 GPixel/s
2.348 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
151.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
4.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
606.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

44W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV535
GPU Name
Hawaii
RV535 FSC
GPU Variant
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
R500
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.33 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
131 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy