Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1700 FSC and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1700 FSC 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
More VRAM (256GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.24GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
May 2007
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
695 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
22.24GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.348 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
2.348 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Board Design

44W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV535
GPU Name
RV560
RV535 FSC
GPU Variant
RV560 GT
R500
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.33 billion
Transistors
0.312 billion
131 mm²
Die Size
230 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
2.1
OpenGL
2.1
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy