Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1950 GT AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2

ATI Radeon X1950 GT AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1950 GT AGP and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1950 GT AGP 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (38.40GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
16 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 57W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Apr 2007
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
16
12
TMUs
8
12
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
6.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV570
GPU Name
GT218
RV570 XL
GPU Variant
-
R500
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.33 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

57W
TDP
40W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
2x Molex
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
2.1 (full) 3.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
3.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy