Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X800 GT AGP vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

ATI Radeon X800 GT AGP vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X800 GT AGP and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X800 GT AGP 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (31.55GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 40W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jan 2007
Radeon R400 AGP
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
493 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
31.55GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

3.784 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
3.784 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
-
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

R420
GPU Name
RV516
R420 GT (215RAACGA12F)
GPU Variant
-
R400
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
130 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.16 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
281 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
1x Molex
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

9.0b (9_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
2.1
OpenGL
2.1
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
-
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy