Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X800 GTO AGP and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 31.36GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Mar 2016
Radeon R400 AGP
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
490 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
31.36GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
4096
12
TMUs
256
12
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

49W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x Molex
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

R420
GPU Name
Capsaicin
R420 GTO
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
R400
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.16 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
281 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0b (9_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
6.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net