ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X800 GTO AGP and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 31.36GB/s)
216 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Sep 2008
Radeon R400 AGP
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
490 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
31.36GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
27
-
Shading Units
216
12
TMUs
72
12
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
49W
TDP
182W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x Molex
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
R420
GPU Name
GT200
R420 GTO
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
R400
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.16 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
281 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0b (9_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
-
Shader Model
4.0
