ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X800 GTO AGP and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 31.36GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Mar 2016
Radeon R400 AGP
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1026 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
490 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
31.36GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
768
12
TMUs
48
12
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
49W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x Molex
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R420
GPU Name
GM206
R420 GTO
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
R400
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.16 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
281 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0b (9_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
-
Shader Model
6.4
