ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X800 GTO AGP and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 475W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 31.36GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Jun 2019
Radeon R400 AGP
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
Apple MPX
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1574 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1720 MHz
490 MHz
Memory Clock
806 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
31.36GB/s
Bandwidth
825.3GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
4096
12
TMUs
256
12
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.1 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
440.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.18 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
14.09 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.045 TFLOPS
Board Design
49W
TDP
475W
200 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
4x Thunderbolt
1x Molex
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R420
GPU Name
Vega 20
R420 GTO
GPU Variant
Vega 20 XT
R400
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.16 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
281 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0b (9_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
6.7
