CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
VS
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2776 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+28471%
12 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
0.042 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
VS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Ada
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
2
2816
Shading Units
40
88
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
RV610
-
GPU Variant
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²
Board Design
70W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
4
AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
5
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
6
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
7
AMD Radeon RX 6600 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
8
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Intel Arc A580
9
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
10
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI FireMV 2260 PCIe x1
Related News
1
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
2
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
3
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
4
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
5
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
6
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
7
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
8
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
9
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
10
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy