NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation

VS

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation

We compared a Desktop platform GPU: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and a Mobile platform GPU: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages

Released 11 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 38% (2130MHz vs 1545MHz)

More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)

Lower TDP (70W vs 100W)

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)

2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

12 TFLOPS

RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation +31%

15.82 TFLOPS

Blender

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

2649

RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation +65%

4383

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

VS

RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation

Graphics Card

Feb 2024

Release Date

Mar 2023

Quadro Ada

Generation

Quadro Ada-M

Desktop

Type

Mobile

PCIe 4.0 x8

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz

Base Clock

1110 MHz

2130 MHz

Boost Clock

1545 MHz

2000 MHz

Memory Clock

2250 MHz

Memory

16GB

Memory Size

12GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

128bit

Memory Bus

192bit

256.0GB/s

Bandwidth

432.0GB/s

Render Config

-

22

SM Count

40

2816

Shading Units

5120

88

TMUs

160

48

ROPs

64

88

Tensor Cores

160

22

RT Cores

40

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

12 MB

L2 Cache

48 MB

-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

98.88 GPixel/s

187.4 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

247.2 GTexel/s

12.00 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

15.82 TFLOPS

12.00 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

15.82 TFLOPS

187.4 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

247.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W

TDP

100W

250 W

Suggested PSU

-

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

None

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Processor

AD107

GPU Name

AD104

-

Ada Lovelace

Architecture

Ada Lovelace

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

5 nm

Process Size

5 nm

18.9 billion

Transistors

35.8 billion

159 mm²

Die Size

294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

8.9

CUDA

8.9

6.7

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 10 GB

2

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM

3

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB

4

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 6790

5

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Intel Arc A380

6

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R7 265

7

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

8

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM

9

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

10

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT

Related News

1

AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT

2

Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card

3

CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory

4

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

5

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

6

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

7

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

8

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

9

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

10

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes