NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro D500
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 243.8GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 274W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+438%
12 TFLOPS
FirePro D500
2.227 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Jan 2014
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
243.8GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
24
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
1536
88
TMUs
96
48
ROPs
32
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
69.60 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.227 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
556.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
274W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti LE GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
