Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro RG220A

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro RG220A

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2736 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +14900%
12 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
May 2010
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
1
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
80
88
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
M93
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy