CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD FireStream 9170
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD FireStream 9170
VS
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
AMD FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+2314%
12 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
VS
FireStream 9170
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Nov 2007
Quadro Ada
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
2816
Shading Units
320
88
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
16
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
RV670
-
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Board Design
70W
TDP
105W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
4
AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
5
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
6
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
7
AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
8
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX
9
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 4350 PCIe x1
10
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB
Related News
1
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
2
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
3
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
4
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
5
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
6
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
7
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
8
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
9
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
10
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy