Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9800 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
2704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +3471%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce 9800 GT
0.336 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Jul 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
22
SM Count
14
2816
Shading Units
112
88
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
16
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.60 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
336.0 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
125W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
G92B
-
GPU Variant
G92-280-B1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy