NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 610 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
2768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+7592%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 610 PCI
0.156 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Apr 2012
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
667 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
10.67GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
1
2816
Shading Units
48
88
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.620 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.480 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
155.5 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.96 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
29W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GF119
-
GPU Variant
GF119-300-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
