Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 130 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
2768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +9900%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 130 OEM
0.12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
48
88
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
12
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
48 KB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.00 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
120.0 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
G94B
-
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy