Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 590 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 164.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 365W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +864%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 590
1.244 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Mar 2011
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
854 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
164.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
22
SM Count
16
2816
Shading Units
512
88
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
48
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.46 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.91 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1244 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
155.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
365W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
3 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy