Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 77% (2130MHz vs 1201MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 112.2GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +387%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 960 OEM
2.46 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Nov 2015
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
1176 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
1201 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.2GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
1024
88
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.43 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.86 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.460 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.86 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GTX 960 OEM
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
5.2
6.7
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy