Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
VS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 12GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Lower TDP (70W vs 200W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (2475MHz vs 2130MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (504.2GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
12 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4070 +142%
29.15 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
2649
GeForce RTX 4070 +115%
5710
OctaneBench
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
295
GeForce RTX 4070 +116%
640
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
VS
GeForce RTX 4070

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Apr 2023
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
1920 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
2475 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
504.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
22
SM Count
46
2816
Shading Units
5888
88
TMUs
184
48
ROPs
64
88
Tensor Cores
184
22
RT Cores
46
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
36 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
158.4 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
455.4 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.15 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.15 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
455.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
AD104
-
GPU Variant
AD104-250-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
295 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM
2
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 6930
3
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
4
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
5
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT X2
6
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
7
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT
8
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM
9
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX
10
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700X

Related News

1
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
2
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
3
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
4
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
5
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
6
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
7
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
8
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
9
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
10
Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy