Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA L20

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA L20

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 48GB VRAM L20 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 275W)
NVIDIA L20 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (2520MHz vs 2130MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
8960 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
12 TFLOPS
L20 +394%
59.35 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Nov 2023
Quadro Ada
Generation
Tesla Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
1440 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
22
SM Count
92
2816
Shading Units
11776
88
TMUs
368
48
ROPs
128
88
Tensor Cores
368
22
RT Cores
92
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
322.6 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
927.4 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
59.35 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
59.35 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
927.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
275W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net