Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150 OEM

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 150 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 141W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +2453%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 150 OEM
0.47 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
22
SM Count
16
2816
Shading Units
128
88
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
16
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.81 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
47.23 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
470.0 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
141W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
G92
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy