Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA NVS 315

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA NVS 315

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
2768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +11900%
12 TFLOPS
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Ada
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
22
SM Count
1
2816
Shading Units
48
88
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
19W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GF119
-
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy