Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 4250

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 4250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 6.336GB/s)
2776 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 4250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +24900%
12 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4250
0.048 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Feb 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
396 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.336GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
40
88
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.376 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.376 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.52 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
RV620
-
GPU Variant
RV620 LE
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy