Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 4730

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 4730

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4730 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 110W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +1150%
12 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4730
0.96 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Jun 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
640
88
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
8
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
960.0 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
192.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
110W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 CE (215-0669093)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy