NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 5770 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 5770 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 76.48GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 108W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+782%
12 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 5770 Mac Edition
1.36 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Jul 2010
Quadro Ada
Generation
Evergreen
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1195 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.48GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
800
88
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.60 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.00 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1360 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
108W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Juniper
-
GPU Variant
Juniper XT
(215-0754013)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.04 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
166 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0
