Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 6870

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 6870

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6870 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 134.4GB/s)
1696 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 151W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +495%
12 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6870
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Oct 2010
Quadro Ada
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1050 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
134.4GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
14
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
1120
88
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
32
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
151W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Barts
-
GPU Variant
Barts XT (215-0798000)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.7 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
255 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy