CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
VS
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 17 years late
Boost Clock2130MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
2720 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 143W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+5163%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
VS
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Feb 2007
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
792 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
320MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.36GB/s
Render Config
22
SM Count
12
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
96
88
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
20
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
80 KB
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.26 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.62 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
228.1 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
G80
-
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
90 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Board Design
70W
TDP
143W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.0
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
4
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
5
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
6
AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
7
AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
8
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R5 330 OEM
9
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
10
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 6700
Related News
1
The P-Cores and E-Cores in Arrow Lake Will Be Interleaved, Reducing Core Communication Latency and Improving Heat Dissipation
2
Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits
3
Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU
4
Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4
5
AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds
6
Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory
7
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2
8
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
9
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
10
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy