Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU

We compared a Desktop platform GPU: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and a Game console GPU: 16GB VRAM Ryzen Z2 A GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (2130MHz vs 1600MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Lower TDP (15W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +632%
12 TFLOPS
Ryzen Z2 A GPU
1.638 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Jan 2025
Quadro Ada
Generation
Console GPU
Desktop
Type
Game console
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
-

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
LPDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
512
88
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
8
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
12 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.20 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.277 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.638 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
102.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
15W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Van Gogh
-
GPU Variant
100-000001835
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
7 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
2.4 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
163 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net