NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 32MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 32 MB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 2.656GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 70W)
Score
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
AGP 4x
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
166 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
32MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
2.656GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
-
88
TMUs
2
48
ROPs
2
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.0 MPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.0 MTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
15W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
VSA-101
-
GPU Variant
Daytona
(355-0025-221)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
180 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
6.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
-
