Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M5725

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M5725

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM FirePro M5725 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2752 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M5725 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +2758%
12.35 TFLOPS
FirePro M5725
0.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2009
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobility
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
320
96
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
M96
-
GPU Variant
M96 GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy