Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M8900

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M8900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +845%
12.35 TFLOPS
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Apr 2011
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
960
96
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Blackcomb
-
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.7 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy