NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (2010MHz vs 1468MHz)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+64%
12.35 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q
7.516 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2017
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 10 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1290 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1468 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
20
3072
Shading Units
2560
96
TMUs
160
48
ROPs
64
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
93.95 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
234.9 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
117.4 GFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.516 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
234.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
150W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GP104
-
GPU Variant
N17E-G3-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
16 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
