NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 460 Mobile
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 460 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 70% (2010MHz vs 1180MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 55W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+483%
12.35 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 460 Mobile
2.115 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Aug 2016
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Mobility Radeon
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1180 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
14
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
896
96
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.88 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.08 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.115 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.115 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
132.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Baffin
-
GPU Variant
Baffin XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
3 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
