Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon E6460

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon E6460

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM Radeon E6460 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2912 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon E6460 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +6332%
12.35 TFLOPS
Radeon E6460
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Apr 2011
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
160
96
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Caicos
-
GPU Variant
E6460
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy