NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Mobile
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (2520MHz vs 2010MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
12.35 TFLOPS
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Mobile
+4%
12.9 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Blackwell-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
2235 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR7
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
20
3072
Shading Units
2560
96
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
80
24
RT Cores
20
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.64 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
201.6 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.90 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.90 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
201.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GB207
-
GPU Variant
GB207
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
159 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
8.9
CUDA
10.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
