Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon E8860

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon E8860

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Radeon E8860 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 222% (2010MHz vs 625MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon E8860 's Advantages
Lower TDP (37W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +1443%
12.35 TFLOPS
Radeon E8860
0.8 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2014
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
575 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
625 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
640
96
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
800.0 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
37W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Venus
-
GPU Variant
Venus MCM
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
© 2025 - TopCPU.net